Here's a Theory

According to this report from the New York Post, all the bullets that ended up striking Bell and his two friends came from one gun, that of Detective Michael Oliver. The Post goes on to criticize the grand jury's decision to charge Detective Gescard Isnora with Manslaughter since, though the detective shot first, he failed to hit any of the victims. Yet this story leads to more interesting questions. It seems to be apparent that Oliver meant to inflict damage to the suspects due to the amount of ammo he shot off, actually having to reload his gun during the melee. That being said, add that now to the fact that he was the only one who hit his targets, and it makes you wonder what were Oliver's intentions. My theory--only a theory mind you--but what if Oliver was hired to make a hit on Bell? Or what if he was hired to put a hit on someone who fit Bell's description? Think of it--this isn't the first time cops have been used as hitmen, and he had been deep undercover. He seems to have some 'good' friends willing enough to give him a 4,200 party the day before the grand jury was set to give his decision, and the scenario would have been perfect to cover up any malfeasance. Bell and his friends come out of a known crime den-Oliver yells out 'gun' and then gets to blasting, and, mock witnesses aside, there wasn't anyone left on the street, and Oliver seemed to be shooting to kill anyone other than his fellow cops.

Something's not adding up here, and by far there's many more questions that need answering. Who exactly was being staked out at the club? What are the officers records? What was the timing of the incident? Why was that spot chosen by the officers to apprehend the suspects?

This is getting more fascinating by the moment.